10 Best Slide & Negative Scanners -

Slide & Negative Scanners - Comparison Table

Rank Image Product Name Score Check Price
1 KODAK Slide N SCAN Film and Slide Scanner with Large 5” LCD Screen, Convert Color & B&W Negatives & Slides 35mm, 126… KODAK Slide N SCAN Film and Slide Scanner with Large 5” LCD Screen, Convert Color & B&W Negatives & Slides 35mm, 126… KODAK
View Product
2 KODAK SCANZA Digital Film & Slide Scanner - Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to JPEG… KODAK SCANZA Digital Film & Slide Scanner - Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to JPEG… KODAK
View Product
3 KODAK Mobile Film Scanner - Fun Novelty Scanner Lets You Scan and Play with Old 35mm Films & Slides Using Your… KODAK Mobile Film Scanner - Fun Novelty Scanner Lets You Scan and Play with Old 35mm Films & Slides Using Your… KODAK
View Product
4 Rybozen 35mm Slide Viewer, 3X Magnification and Desk Top LED Lighted Illuminated Viewing and Battery Operation-for 35mm… Rybozen 35mm Slide Viewer, 3X Magnification and Desk Top LED Lighted Illuminated Viewing and Battery Operation-for 35mm… Rybozen
View Product
5 Rybozen Mobile Film and Slide Scanner, Converts 35mm Slides & Negatives into Digital Photos with Your Smartphone Camera… Rybozen Mobile Film and Slide Scanner, Converts 35mm Slides & Negatives into Digital Photos with Your Smartphone Camera… Rybozen
View Product
6 KODAK Mini Digital Film & Slide Scanner – Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to 22 Megapixel… KODAK Mini Digital Film & Slide Scanner – Converts 35mm, 126, 110, Super 8 & 8mm Film Negatives & Slides to 22 Megapixel… KODAK
View Product
7 Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution Film to Digital Converter with 4.3' Screen and HDMI Output (Black) Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution Film to Digital Converter with 4.3' Screen and HDMI Output (Black) Wolverine
View Product
8 KODAK 35mm Slide and Film Viewer - Battery Operation, 3X Magnification, LED Lighted Viewing – for 35mm Slides & Film… KODAK 35mm Slide and Film Viewer - Battery Operation, 3X Magnification, LED Lighted Viewing – for 35mm Slides & Film… KODAK
View Product
9 Wolverine 8mm & Super 8 Reels to Digital MovieMaker Pro Film Digitizer, Film Scanner, 8mm Film Scanner, Black (MM100PRO) Wolverine 8mm & Super 8 Reels to Digital MovieMaker Pro Film Digitizer, Film Scanner, 8mm Film Scanner, Black (MM100PRO) Wolverine
View Product
10 DIGITNOW 22MP All-in-1 Film & Slide Scanner, Converts 35mm 135 110 126 and Super 8 Films/Slides/Negatives to Digital JPG… DIGITNOW 22MP All-in-1 Film & Slide Scanner, Converts 35mm 135 110 126 and Super 8 Films/Slides/Negatives to Digital JPG… DIGITNOW
View Product
BestReviewsTips logo max

Top Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews: KODAK Slide N SCAN ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 50 ratings
4 / 5
I have used partorisca be the fact of professional photographer 20 years and have the plot of images partorisca scan. Colour, B&W and slides. It has looked for the scanner that could accuse some scrolling and fast images to my computer directly. I do not want to it has to that take out of a SD paper, scanner some his images, the take up and that scrolling to a computer. This little scanner a work. It does not transfer directly to a computer but has an option partorisca enable partorisca transfer directly invernadero USB. Work so only well. This is not the scanner of professional note but partorisca DIY or any the one who only wants to digitize his images this is perfect. Balance by heart and adjustments of law of image well. It would recommend to scan an image and the a lot of corrections in a computer. Some escáneres of device quickly. (1) 35mm The image so only takes 1 or 2 seconds partorisca scan and the scrolling to a computer is also like this fast. It maintains to import this device can not fix bad images. Over time the film will degrade, scratch, curve, funds etc and this device can not fix concealed. But you can fix these subjects in a computer with software. But for the by heart simple isolation calms can not beat this scanner.
5 / 5
Looks to be facts well, work like this described and reasonably easy to operate in the very moderate prize. One 5' the screen is sum to revise and regulating a lighting or colour of a slide yes is necessary. Note that does not operate in an electrical wall outlet. Work out of one of USB of your computer outlets. A second outlet is required to down upload some pictures, has take this in spite of a SD paper and place he in my office the chip of the upper computer outlet eats to do when transferring pictures of my camera. It has done well and some pictures looked utmost in the big screen of a computer. I will be digitizing roughly 2000 35mm slides. Very pleased with a unit.
5 / 5
Are the girl of one 1950 east. All the world in my familiar and especially my Grandfather has used Ektachrome still slides. When I Have been he is gone in the university has studied Art and a fundamental method to transmit the images was by means of slides. It was tandard operative procedure' for the long time. Has the Kodak projector of slide of the Carousel still into use. I have taken slides of all reason Ektachrome was always in mine Pentax Spotmatic F. Has accrue add it a lot of slides with which almost 70 years but many of has not been seen the very long time. Ossia Up to now. I do not have the place to dip on the projector and I have for the long time has required the way to achive this history has registered. The one investigation here and has discovered this unit of Kodak. Has read descriptions and has learnt to toss a demonstrably bad some of those with axes to grind (2 for any SD the paper comprised) . I have bought this and has fallen enamoured with him well out of a box. It is very easy to dip up and use with reference very small to a manual. They are one of these people that does not like using manual. Had to the few things likes them learn a sample is not drawn to be continuous but so only to focus to date that knowing in a start has saved some frustration but for one the majority to separate some keys in a cup will explain. I have had the box of slides of slides that floating around emotional in my present location that had separated the ones of a bulk desquels has tent. I have loved to see the one who this box contained but is not that easy to resist them until a light and see everything of a detail. So much with new Kodak unit now plugged to a port of USB of mine iMac headed to a stranger. With a unit powered on and the fast gaze in a manual to see the key to press to revise was them was down walks by heart. It was initially so only that goes to look in the pair of to images to see like some images looked in 5 screen of thumb. But the punctual was taken like this for a quality that has seen them that it has been them has been a slide with which another until each one of almost 200 slides had been registered. I have possessed several spectators of slide in some late 80 east and punctual to mid 90 east and was always problematic to use. They were only boxes of small projection whose lights have generated always treat adds of hot and was weighed enough to use and tent. And they were only spectators without mesos imagine them record. This Kodak the unit has solved everything for me. It is quite small that chairs comfortably among mine other pieces in mine desk this in spite of quite big to easily see a screen. It is also very stable and will rest comfortably wherever is situated. This unit has for me been a response for everything that has required them. Now I have the reason to excavate the old slides of my Grandfather he relive some meetings navideñas when all the world was still around. The integer heartedly recommend this Kodak the recorder/spectator to any with alike needs.
5 / 5
A unit would not leave a characteristic of date for some slides to be dipped earlier that a year 2000. Ossia Useful to store some dates of picture for pertinent placing in a library of image. A screen to dip of the date has left date before 2000, but when a date has been saved, was reset to a year 2000 if a year 1999 or more has been punctual has used. If the date was after 2000 has been used, a date has saved a correct year, likes 2005. It had bought this to of the slides of the oldest archive. I have contacted a Kodak put of support, and has received an email that has declared that a recent batch of HW all there has been this question and instruct me to knots to return an element to a vendor.
5 / 5
Has dipped some right expectations, and think that this will do well. I have had 110, 35mm, and an old Kodak film of camera of the click of a @@@1970s-@@@1980s to spend stops. I have opted to scan a negatives like this opposed to some pictures with some hopes of better quality. It would say that. A quality was substantially better with 35mm that 110 - but that feels frames because it is such the small film formed, and a quality was always bad!

Scanner in the subject of the calm seconds once take a film sita in a window. It is quite easy to regulate a light brightness or balance by heart of the transmission. This in spite of, have not annoyed with any external adjustments of some light - I has used a software of native photo in my PC that does the quite decent work.

So much for my purposes of digitizing 40 year film familiarised, ossia he 5 product of star . If you are to him it expects it perfection ... This is not a tool.
5 / 5
Easy spouse up. Be sure to have a SD paper (any comprised) with adapter. I took the little while to agree that the keys have done that, but once has taken a hangs of him, was súper easy to operate. I have chosen this model because it has had a screen a big plus like calm really can see an image is doing on. Scrollings my Windows 10 computers is súper easy. A project adds during one tops lock of virus-down to convert all my grandparents' slides the digital. A caveat, some of his slides were main that 35mm as a whole the image does not convert . It was able to do around in the majority of them to insert a slide rotated 90 or 180 terracings to take a @@subject to a converted image.
4 / 5
Like the professional photographer and manager of laboratory, highly can recommend this little desk scanner. Like this pros, a lot little if any gilipollas for me. Has access in acting to the quite decent pro flatbed scanner that pode the half comunicacionales transparent but the work is, well laws. Never chronometer to mark to do mine own scanner. And taken more time to dip until doing the scanner so only that this little device has done.
In the first place, an impression is wonderful for my already cluttered office. A bit slider accessories of flat maintenances in the little cup of next pencil but is all so it compresses compared to the flatbed.
After, an ease of a onscreen the controls are easy to use. Admitted, know my way around these devices but still, I didnt really feel likes it was very difficult.
Finally, a quality is sum . The people have tendencies to agree film quite romantically and he really wasnt all this big of resolution. Still, scanning slides of house and negatives in the resolution of impression of 300 ppi is to good sure possible. Has thousands of the familiar slides and he no only servants like the spectator but of course, calm once sees you can scan.
Gilipollas Is extraordinarily little. Yes, I need the paper by heart but have abundance lying around this in spite of, has bought still one to be consecrated and stay in this little unit all a time. So much, another with is not that big of the shot but simply that to transfer to your computer, will have to open a paper in your computer like the 'device' calm connected like him , all a time, and only tug some files and copy them on to the file in your hard walk. Again, any big shot that it doesnt scanner directly to a computer so that it is the minor with mine. Based in a creation of a device to accommodate different measures of half comunicacionales transparent, some trays of films are the pocolos wiggly inside a device but any the breaker of extracted again.
A very fresh appearance of this flexibility is a capacity to insert and scan very old 35 mm film of film. Has the little reels and was finally able to see an integer reels of the Informative Paramount film I found of recognition for FDR to rural Georgia. It could very never scan this in the flatbed easily. With this I so only rigged on the 'headline' for a reel and the take up for another side and has moved a film by means of a unit to scan the frame of the each one has shot. The escáneres of sample of the estaca later.
Like the title has said, love this little scanner and happy bought it.
5 / 5
The element adds for a point of prize. It has varied hundred 35mm slides to convert the digital. An adapter for them is the well is returned. Push some slides by means of 1 with which another. Each lines of successive slide on a slide to precede in a spectator. Press a key to copy and push in a next slide. The adapter resists to 3 total slides likes him 4th slide presses a first side out of another side. If a quality of the picture of the slide is a lot then touch the work of slide of push, click, push, click. There is colour and adjustment of builds of contrast in of to that reads a lot enough for minor adjustments. It would result unneccessarily complicated to add much more adjustments of exposure. An exposure is acute and one 5' the screen is sum . You can transfer directly of a SD paper while his in a unit .. Transmission to way of scrolling of the USB and scrolling, deletes, etc. Can very any one another software modifies functions of computers the unit. Need to move a SD paper to computer for that.
5 / 5
Reason any one have left to know that we require a SD paper to do this work? A description can locate of a star, but now included am not happy.
Revised. Ossia The simple car that has no special capacities. It is not the very smooth operation and need to be fiddled with to do. Ossia The a lot of overpriced schemes this has limited use and will be returned.
To the as it would like me see in this point of prize is the good cropping tool and some software that would leave some modifying. Also I have nonstandard the film and this tool does not offer anything but level. A continuous investigation.
5 / 5
Does not come with a sd paper (32 gb max) which precise but has been remarked in a web of place. No the big shot. Sometimes it can be the little delicate to insert some trays but if any calm the laws of forces. This model has the screen he big plus that give leading form that it is well. You can any 8mm but concealed does not import like this any short his 8mm to returned to the east. From time to time when you try to save the clashes of picture but calm so only restart and take again, any question. You can customise a date of a file but ossia the ache and one 1900 is does not aim at least any in win10. He no imbed a date in a file he, so only like this formed of type. Progressively it numbers each picture.
I frames sure have some beat to air compressed to blow out of any powder that takes inner. I have used a brightness transmissions to enhance pictures but any one some transmissions by heart. If I need to do transmissions to your pictures more will be done in a computer.
Is always the surprise when you insert/to insert an old negative and see perfect colours in a screen. It has surprised also that old ektachrome does not have on resisted like kodachrome and technicolor has done on some years.
Taken stirs it of old slides and negatives ossia for you. So easier that save to the computer that order come from of old shoeboxes. Spent this and calm likes.

Top Customer Reviews: KODAK SCANZA ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
2 / 5
I have bought a Kodak Scanza in an idea will take the images of better quality of my Slide and the refusals have compared in a Wolverine Titn has. My evaluation as follows:

1) in my surprise, a unit is not in fact done for Kodak. It is marked only so Kodak so mentioned in a manual page 35: Kodak any way this product or provides to guarantee or behind. KODAK Has authorised Mark Licensee, C&A Marketing, Inc.. By so, these products has not been designed or fact for Kodak, only marked like Kodak!

2) IS announced likes 22 Megapixels machine. Even so, in fact it has the 14 Megapixels the sensor and he are the software developed or interpolated in 22MP. Page 31 of a Sensor of manual states 14MP CMOS, resolution 14MP/22MP interpolated.

3) The screen of small Exposure has compared in a Wolverine. Kodak The screen is 3.5 while a Wolverine is 4.3 with exposure more acute a lot of. Side of control-for-side of image by side.

4) Fontes of the card of the Screen is very small and no the cosy user.

5) The Operative buttons are localised in a screen. Every time you press the button some curves of machine . I require two hands to scan, or to line a machine and another to press some buttons!

6) Opens gone in some files to start with. A product of Kodak dye very bluish and images of tower. It controls some pointed images of a Kodak and a Wolverine.

Has believed finally that it take schemes it better that a Wolverine but is not a case. I go me to bond in my unsuspecting Wolverine unit of Titn. You have seen a Wolverine machines in a piece for more concealed 10 years and have the product has designed better.
3 / 5
BACKDROP: I am the pro photographer and also possesses the side by side negotiates small that the marks have swept of photo and restablecimiento. To arrive to this point, has no able state to find any one 35mm slide/negative scanners that it was abordable and hurriedly big-scanners of quality. One ones that you still can find that he big-the scanners of quality are expensive ($ 6500 for the Nikon 8000), has sucky software, and more importantly, takes several minutes to scan. It IS almost impossible to scan hundreds (or more) slide that subjects, especially when has to can it individually manually.
This Kodak Scanza is similar in the little another in a piece (particularly a Wolverine F2D), but since already has the Kodak of big speed/Alaris scanner of impression, thought that it would try easterly the unit IS very only the cheap digital camera has configured to scan, but is a concept has been expecting stops.. It opens, they would do the unit of the main quality like this in the reasonable prize, would be throughout it. For now, this one can suffice to produce mediocre consumer-the images of entity, but would want to see the best one with the more dulcemente acute and at least the slightly more the big resolution. Included better would be or with some automatic powers that the will scan the bouquet of slide while works in other things. (A SlideSnap can do that, but vintage of uses, has used projectors of Kodak, and can cost in $ 4,000 for the complete setup.)

A Pros:
- Marks a work of good for slide of scanner and negs, but is far from pro quality.
- Fast scanners (digital capture) in 1-2 bren.
- Economic.

Some Gilipollas:
- building of Cheap plastic. Some of some adapters listen likes him go to break when try open them, as it was not that the time will last.
- Although hurriedly to scan, the still can does does not want hundreds to scan or thousands of the slide since has it can manually.
- Very also acute image, but would have to do to print until enough 8x10 measured of the slide of acute or negative original.
- Does not say what dpi/ppi that is to say, but in 14mb, is quite 3000 in my evaluation. Any bad, but only maintain that it imports that these pixels are not too acute. I skip using a built-in interpolation in a 22mb measured, like the quality and the acuteness degrade enough bit it. I recommend to do your own arrive-sizing is necessary.
5 / 5
Wow That can say it. This produces new of Kodak is surprising. I actuate Never the left the description in any produced, but is thank you to do so in this product. At the beginning it was restless quite buying this look of cheap product and has had my doubts. The boy has been surprised. The negative scanner and the slides are the very easy and hassle free. Scanners of use of the final of big plus and was always the very tedious process. Desprs Scanning my images and uploading in my computer is taking resulted that it is also like resolution of half scanners that took it here in him some professional laboratories. That buys some subjects is in $ 25.00 bucks for circle. This will be the enormous savings for any one concealed is shooting 35mm slide or negative film. Only simply it accuses your film and do a scanning you. Down it is the 45 year of old year BW negative out of a box of old shoe and the new slide of 2017 scanned with this product.
2 / 5
The product is very only . Any sample well in mine 40' the television has DIRECTED, and first unit is come with any the bad HDMI cord or socket in a scanner. Some scanners were well for some economic builds 14/22 MP scanner/of camera. A zone to scan the scopes have ignited hurriedly. All this beats of subjects that is looked-on yes only is that he the dozen or so slide. But I have had in 2000 slides to scan. A carrier for some slide that is supposition to leave an user to insert the slide, push he with a next slide and so on, was horrid. Each slide, if it was not perfectly flat, would take in a verge of a headline, he doing necessary to take a headline, takes a slide blockaded and beginnings on. Desprs Flavour to accuse in the slide of dozen, left and is returned a scanner in Amazon. It take the second a which there has been the sake HDMI socket and cord, but a subject with a slide subtracts carrier. For the product of Kodak, expected better. It returns a second unit and is preparing to use a service to scan of external slide to of the archive my half comunicacionales.
4 / 5
A Kodak Scanza has done in my expectations. It has scanned some 1400 slides in the weekend (in front of a television), the majority of time admitttedly has involved in me manually renaming some slide to preserve date info. The diet of slide is manual, but enough fast. If you are not trying to maintain the orderly things, you ccould probably done the slide besides or 5 less bren for the choose up, he orienting, powering he in a guide, and pressing a espuede' button. Relatively little of my ancient slides blockaded and each which cleared by removeing a guide of slide and wiggling a slide bit it. A resolution was reasonably well. An a lot of thin sliver of an image of original slide is yard has entered some verges (some few totals of common problem of descriptions to compete devices). Colour and depth to look to contrast to be cart-adjusted, meaning some necessity of slide to be saturation by heart-augmented or contrast-has augmented. Law with 40 in slide of 50 years, and some of the same can have been some slide. A quirk is that a time of unit seals some files that begins in June of half night 1, 2017 (the reset every time visits in a unit).
3 / 5
Full revelation has purchased this and then routed the backside in the pair of days.

A Sake That is to say the handy scanner while it operates in the lean it only road does not require the computer. To scan the slide is quite hurriedly and easy to use although adjusting a slide in a scanner backlight can take the small practice. A card of screen is intuitive and enough hurriedly once practical during the minute or two. If precise scanner 35mm slide and does not require additional tweaking, likes correction by heart, adjustments of contrast, scrolling of scratch, etc., This product is ideal.

A Bad So remarked, that is to say the very good scanner of SLIDE but opposite in some recoveries of product, is not also in negative film. A lack of net-arrive' the ways of software take what apresamiento. A colour represents and the acuteness is only any one included like slide.

An Ugly some fixtures has used to the power an element to be scanned is quirky. A fixture of the slide is quite mere and a push of slide through easily although so remarked, varying some slide under a scanner can take some work. Some fixtures that control a negative individual or launch is abysmal. Some refusals very inset cleanly, and any slide through easily. Trying press a negative film through advantages to film verges angled and broke. An only road to take a negative planted properly is to take a fixture, vary the only frame and then re-inset in a scanner. Then this process is repeated every time for each frame for each band. In of the this, some negative fixtures is totally useless for curled film (that spends with age) and no at all with 110 games of film.

The inferior line used for sake of slide. Used by anything more very also.
5 / 5
I am a familiar historian and tried to digitise familiar slide so decided to purchase the different mark at the beginning (magnasoni.c) And has not been happy with some results! I have decided then try THIS PRODUCT (the KODAK SCANZA) - was a lot to estimate an extra money - some pictures were clearer, a screen was better quality and some adjustments were easier to use in a device. A beginning for a Kodak Scanza is quite 4.8 MBs of data, a Magnasoni.c IS quite 2 MBs of data. A picture IZQUIERDO has attached in this description is of a Kodak Scanza (with any go down and blue contrast tweaking) , and a photo in a right is of a premier produced and experience (a lot of grainy and saturated, the black is that it overwhelms). It expects these helps of description another with his time and money!!!
5 / 5
That is to say the good product in some limits of the concealed is designed by and what has wanted. That has wanted is something concealed could digitise old negative this has had to to seat in the box for some last 20 years, so that, afterwards, could pose the in Lightroom and organise them. It IS mostly the road to take old memories -- take people that is no longer with me or the familiar members of the mark of long time.

A device is enough to use. Only it finds a pertinent to insert for a negative type, opens one inserts/inserts, besieges a negative, fences in one inserts/inserts, slide in a device, and then can some negative by the rights vanamente left manually to plant each frame in a spectator. A spectator is good to identify that has but does not provide deep detail.

Some files save in a SD the card bought and afterwards can them import in LightRoom of a SD card and organise and label them.
1 / 5
I have purchased this scanner and he have prisoner to do afterwards or scanners. I called 'DBroth' (the vendor) and said has to press a 'on' button for the little bren. It conceals it it has not done so returned the. I have purchased the second an of DBroth and has the scratch in a lentil and the white point. These both have looked on all some slide has scanned. There is any road to clean these elements was so that they are in an interior. As I am returned that scanner. It opens I am buying mine 3 scanner of DBroth and while some third times are the charm . Kodak Would have to when being the good product, but obviously a control of the quality is not there.
4 / 5
I do in production of clave of the film, likes to scan of the film is something is quite familiar with - and while I only am giving 4 stars so that this scanner only scanners in the linear file in planting to take a dynamics of a negative film in the RAW file, is essentially the flatbed scanner for negative - am in fact totally happy with a quality of some captures! I have taken more than the circles of hundred of refusals in the only evening, a quality is totally reasonable, and issues it better that some scanners had done impressions in the flatbed. It takes the long time to choose this model out of an a lot of that it is available - and is happy was Kodak.

Is not to perfect, is not professional level, if you it photographer those looks for negative scanner and do the big impressions would spend more money - but if it only is looking to of the archive your memories as it can see the easily in your computer, that is to say the election adds .

Top Customer Reviews: KODAK Mobile Film ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
5 / 5
At the beginning some looks of device flimsy, but when properly totalled is quite robust to back your ready telephone. One spacing is well for a purpose and a clear source are marks and same daylight for rendition of the good colour of some slide is copying. Since I am using an iPhone, has done spacers to ensure a telephone would be in a right gesture (photos of views) and has used the light magnification to do sure an image of the slide has filled a frame. He a work. I finish to cross in 1800 slides in or chair. It remarks - do sure some slide is planted with an emulsion 'arrive' to take calm the majority of acute captures!
1 / 5
It looks for the scanner of film and after looking for thru consecrated to cost scanners of basses $ 70 in in $ 140, resolved in this device. I have imagined that that uses a much more powerful electronics in the modern and his mobile phone 12 megapixel the the camera would have to yields also if any better result.
This device and an application have associated to fail miserably!
1- An application very automatically detects some verges of a film. Any one automatically adjusts light of backdrop. Any one any one of a esmart' the things would expect. Only it take it the picture. I need to adjust a zoom and harvests a picture manually. A result is far worse when compared in the traditional flatbed scanner.
2- A fixture listens likes him is done of goleada. Flimsy And probably less side that the few dollars to do!
In general, very unsatisfied and will be to return a product.
4 / 5
A problem with each-in-some scanners of slide are that some economic ones have mediocre cameras, and one ones with good cameras are, well, expensive. Felizmente, Kodak (that it was it evening in a revolution of digital photograph) has recognised that today the cameras of tlphonique is very well, and that we duffers only necessity something to do the hundred or two slides or negative. A scanner of Kodak of the film of the Mobile phone returns that niche. You could build your own scanner, but has posed some together parts in the convenient container. Only plant a slide in a mini clear-table, aims a camera through a hole in a goleada, and click.
Has found that some work to scan more using a 2x optic zoom in my camera. Alas, a Kodak of the application provides only covers for digital zooming, so for the positive slide only uses the application of camera of my telephone. For refusals, will have to use an application of Kodak, which are quite primitive compared in other applications of the camera there when comes to edit your photo has scanned. In fact, that is to say one of some two substantive limitations of a container.
One another limitation is that the calm can not adjust a height of your camera of tlphonique in a slide. A container is the goleada , a-measured-access-all the thing. I am not also preoccupied in a goleada, since does not have to no a lot of slide to scan. But yours the camera can not be able to direct well in a height has provided.
A prize? Yes, the big small for something concealed is launched of the goleada and that does not comprise some stacks, but mine of return necessities and is something would buy again, included with his limitations.
4 / 5
Law to read mine 35 old year negative. Any so big quality as it has accused them but alot easier. The more can use it on and on for other refusals. My only ache with him is that calm very precise be in the dark place to take some better results.
1 / 5
I have purchased the one of is this expects to scan the big collection of the slide that uses my Iphone 6. I found it impossible to centre and direct any one of my slide. It looks a problem is one contrasts among the frame of a slide and a real slide. One contrasts lider' in a Kodak Mobil Scanner of Film ap does not help. I have not been able to take anything another concealed washed-out of blurred blobs, as I am returned a scanner for the repayment.
5 / 5
Hurriedly, The scanners of good quality that it is easy to share. Nice this edits tools. Easy to pose up and use. Convenient storage.

The May HAS EXPECTED to substitute ours $ 500+ digital film scanner that use for big resolution, the work has detailed.

A Scanner of Kodak of Mobile Film an admirable work to create shareable, camera-tlphonique-images of quality. Some tools to edit are the good addition that experimentation of covers with contrast, correction by heart, etc.

Attaches small scanner for a prize.
5 / 5
I very which products of Kodak of mark! This device really impacted me, has not been sure himself one treats manually, but he a lot surmounted my expectations! I require the main machine to conform a task for or a quantity of need of refusals to print pictures of, and require one this can hook until the printer, but the work attaches a view of a negative has the plot in planned with your electronic device while in the this clears some beginnings of picture, and dry your negative with the chemist and left wing of cloth or free tissue to clear he of any powder, but will not be disappointed, a quality is surprising for a prize!!
4 / 5
I have purchased this scanner of film in hurriedly class through the set of 35 mm slide to decide which ones to have professionally s
digitised, and has done perfectly for that. It does not think a quality of marks of the very big scanner digital images, but has not required he for that. Has some annoy to use the at the beginning, but has nicknamed a number of tlphonique proportionate for help, and took it then to do only well.
4 / 5
That is to say only that has required. Mere, Portable, and a technology improves every time takes the new telephone . Easily I can film to see and digitise he for familiar, partner, and I.

Lightbox What records out of 2 EA stacks. The stacks would have to when being ensured by the ray but the mine has been missing the ray to ensure a box of stack.
Works with 35mm film, 35mm Slide, and 35mm the reels of circle/of microfilm.
Spent to do digital copies with Application of Kodak, Your Application of the camera has preferred, or still with the Application of the scanner of PDF has preferred.

Kodak The application did not retreat B&W positive Copy.
Has required to use a box enters to take photos perpendicularly such that your telephone maintains properly.
Is not the complete blackbox as it can want to when being in the drop of clear zone.

Ideas for future descriptions of boxes and application of Kodak (iphone version)
Comprises the bank of stack of the USB to touch your telephone with.
Attaches the B&W positive Scanner in Application of Kodak
the annex swept of PDF with OCR option in Application of Kodak
Considers to attach tab of genealogy in application of Kodak for integration with applications for Name, Familysearch, MyHeritage, etc. ?
2 / 5
Still although this product was very cheap, a quality of some photos has scanned would not have to result so bad. A mechanism was supremely dysfunctional. A box of stack this has shined a light has been rasgada averts, residue had of hot glue of a goleada, and a photo that edits application of Kodak has not been very at all. Has an iPhone that has the decent camera. A camera was able to choose in a content of photo, but was absolutely impossible to edit of negative in positive. An application there has been a characteristic to edit saturation, vieta, annex of the frames and attaches adhesives, but has not thought to comprise an option to convert the negative film in a real positive unit

Top Customer Reviews: Rybozen 35mm Slide ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 20 ratings
5 / 5
It tries 3 different slides spectators so far, each which or with subjects like a slide that takes bonded or a clear not going was. This one east at the end that has looked for. The power of slides of an upper and or presses of a button the hideout was. Power of negative film by a part. I add it finds.
5 / 5
A Rybozen 35mm film and Spectator of records of utmost Slides
has Bought not knowing that law. It founds boxes of old familiar slide and film, to cross.
All has had to is posed some stacks in and the work adds for this task. Easy to pose slide in, button of just push after and the pop of slides was. There is another something in slide some refusals through very easily.
For a that is to say perfect Value for my necessities!
5 / 5
Thanks to your product can see slide that has been done taken of the decades. It IS easy to use and quite small to transport. Thank you!
5 / 5
I have required only copy some slide to find he of class. At all elegant. I have taken my iPad or iPhone and has taken only pictures of some images. Fact like the charm. I have used then a software of Apple in my iPad to edit a light and the colour and was utmost. This spectator is solid, some stays of light on, is not to maintain pressing a low slide to turn in a light. In planting to pay $ 300-$ 400 in professionally convert my slide, this product for $ 30 an excellent work. While you are ailing and careful that plants a lentil of your iPad or iPhone, that is to say perfect.
5 / 5
I have bought two of this calm so that you gave you already my description in a first unit At all more can say people So very has discovered the trove of slide when some threads an old plus is died. My another the threads found these slides and this spectator was ideal to see and saves a sake ones. Good colour and augmenting capacities. This wants to buy the projector of slide anymore
5 / 5
I have bought this for some old (60 yrs old!) The slide has. Work perfectly. I want a small tray that control some slide when expel them. Very easy to use. I recommend this product!!
5 / 5
Easy to use, generic AC the adapter had done well. When being very robust and good magnification with the light has DIRECTED. My situation was my negative was on age to insert in spectator as I have finished to do easy turn of element. It chooses Rybozen in the future. Thank you
3 / 5
Bought this when some projector of decades of the old slide expsito in the house of my late father has prendido to do. I have required to cross his 1000+ slides to see if any digitise costs. I have not wanted to buy the new projector for essentially the use of time. This spectator is VAL, but very aggravate to use. At least 30% of some slide takes hanged and will not expel . I have used the clip of the paper straightened to take them unstuck. A lot the intensive work - take - in an hour to cross a carousel of 120 slides.
Does not augment an image the plot, but is pertinent. Like Another critic, decided to take pictures of some images with my camera and the seeds edits the in my computer - this will save me hundreds in having them digitised. Some beaks are exited very good. For this reason only, this compraventa has be worth it. $ 32 Very past, included with an aggravation.
4 / 5
As it Describes in other descriptions, a functionality is sum . A difference of some older versions is an use of one lighting has DIRECTED. Although I found it could be it the little more than shine, work well to see slide without an excess heat of an older light bulb-the spectators have ignited. A downside, while it mentions in of the a lot of descriptions, is a tendency of some slide to take 'taken' each once and again. I think that that this goes to be a subject for a person I foreseen to give the in so much is older and touching on can weigh a whole spectator to fall slide bonded.
2 / 5
Alas I can not give this product the positive critic. Some slide that taken of a developer is level sized but any one to a void of this spectator. It have cut the to insert them. Besides inserting and take some slide is afterwards in impossible. I have to use the slender instrument to press them all a road in to see them and then uses a device to press them all a road through.

Top Customer Reviews: Rybozen Mobile Film ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 49 ratings
5 / 5
Quite sturdy sustain plastic. A recommended application (PicScanner) is simple to use, but produces small (150-200 kB) jpeg images in mine IPHONE 8. Very better the images are possible that use another application: Mag-Light. These Mb the images leave decent visualisation in the screen the big plus. Some pictures of accompanying sample were copies of the slides took in Europe on done 60 years. A quality is quite acceptable partorisca in projection of house. I have very tried other methods to try to copy slides, and, like this far this has resupplied an easier solution.
4 / 5
Has bought this to convert -100 slides and was a lot of value one $ 40 investment. It is simple, intuitive and works.

Has used this with the Note of Galaxy 9 but would have to that it reads with any telephone of camera. I have not used an application suggested reason already have several applications of photograph.

Because of the be light projected by means of a film and the lentil of camera, is possible for your telephone to on heat. This is to spend mine with which 30 minutes of continuous scanning. It has taken simply the pause to leave my telephone to cool was and then resumed swept.
4 / 5
Almost has loved to send behind been due to a fact that his application has not done paralización Samsung Galaxy S20 (imagines new telephone!!) But application expósita 'Photo Negative Scanner. View And Convert Film of Paint' (pic semi-detached) which recommends for Samsung Galaxy S20. I am maintaining this scanner 🙂
4 / 5
the product goes near in of the seconds. Add the pair of EA the batteries and you are copying colour slides in your ready telephone. Scrolling to PC and modify calm so that desire, the copy was in DVD and send to Grandma. Or send of the yours telephone he there there is so only the little. Easy peasy.
5 / 5
15 years ago has been given the pocolos slides of hundred of familiar of one 50 east and 60 is. At the same time, it was very expensive to have them all has printed. They have seated in the drawer for all this time until I am coming to this simple but effective way to transfer slides and negatives to digital format. It was dubious at the beginning that a quality would be that I add, but after my first tentativa, an ease of use, crispness and the big quality of a copy impressed a lot. A bit those that the adjustments with one modify function in mine iPhone and the colours were once agin true the life. Mina only beef, and reason so only four stars, is that some only measures read 24mm x 36mm. These old slides are 35mm x 35mm, like the bit of an upper and the fund of a picture is cut was. A measure is marked clearly in a box and description, so only has to that no @to @give a real measure of these older slides. With a lot it likes me he would buy another in 35x35mm, but does not look to do one. Has plans to take some familiar together this weekend and rediscover these together old pictures. I have not downloaded an application still, and no really need he for regular slides. But to convert 35mm film negatives to the positive impression will require software to convert. Highly recommended!
4 / 5
Has looked for the light box to use with a FilmBox application and found this element. It is at all elegant and fact of economic materials, but real work well with an application. It is very easy to use, maintains a negative paving and situate while utilisation an application. I gave it 4 stars in place of 5 likes the desire has resisted a negatives more firmly. A negative has some wiggle room but another that that does well. I do not have any slides so that it can not comment in that he well laws with slides.
5 / 5
Has found this very easy to use. I have used he with an iPhone and has included so only using a camera regulates without an application was well for me, then will go in and modify with my need of own software to (the mine is colour positive slides). An application was amused to touch with, but has used he without mostly. The product is down-technology, but well currency he. It would have been disturbed has has paid tonnes more thus elegant plus some.
4 / 5
This device certainly the mark to digitize your 35mm slides, to use the camera of your telephone. It looks roughly pocola test and error to take some photos to exit well, and die the one who manual a process is, is not súper-fast. But a device basically does a way his supposition to, and for me was in good sure value a $ 30.
5 / 5
A scanner of slide of economic smartphone (in fact he digitizer) has arrived so only. Mina very old PrimeFilm
These products to scan copies very better, but, is engine no longer read with my windows 8 & 10 computers. This in spite of, in my opinion, for $ 30 ossia the quite good solution . My telephone of android (a Motorcycle G6) has had the pair of subjects that has had to direct first.

A distance of the lentil of a telephone to a slide is too close up to direct a Motorcycle , but was able to direct that to dip the spacer of half thumb to move a telephone slightly further out of a slide.

Was necessary to use a the control of Motorcycle of manual camera to take acceptable copies. A Motorcycle control them manual comprise exposed and manual house and a camera also resupplies manual 'zooming' to frame an image of slide. ( It remarks this 'zooming' the digital image reduces a resolution of image)

assumes that a device is drawn for iPhone, but is the shame that a designer there is not dipping the little more the time that read with telephones of android.

A subject big is distance of lentil and would have been died simple to comprise estacas of half thumb to extend some canes of support.
A hole for a lentil does not return a Motorcycle.
A headline of slide any slide of apt metal.
A fund of illumination is rectangular, then , no with square slides.

Also, has not used an application that a scanner resupplies... For one trying, has taken simply some images how has been uploaded to google photo, has gone to google photo and cropped his to return.

Any software of good image like IrfanView will leave to use a scanner to take the big number of images, then step of the batch of the use likes rotation to fix multiple images immediately. You can also scanner 35mm negatives and the mass converts him to positive using IrfanView.
4 / 5
What worse never. You owe that install an application, and one first sew an application asks calm for this yours email address and information of paper of the credit. Any one mentions of that in a description! It does not buy this

Top Customer Reviews: KODAK Mini Digital ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
4 / 5
It IS the sceptic of bit of a advertiser recoveries so that it have spent his in $ 300 that converts slide in of the digital photos with the professional service. Desprs Converting quite 200 slides with a Kodak Mini Digital Scanner, does not see any difference in quality among this turn this device and these converted for a professional service. Very easy to use and an easy to comprise manual. To well sure it will recommend a device in another.
5 / 5
I have found the box of my negative old Dad, my woman found the boxes of his Dad 35mm slide. Only I am beginning and has scanned enough 30 of the each. A scanner is easy to use and compact. Some cover of cord of the power in the port of USB in the laptop. Walk of guide of separate plastic for each type of film is marked clearly and lock in in a scanner, then pode only constantly can one films through and exits an another side. The film is scanned in a SD card. Once a card is full, there the button is by train to leave you to upload some scanners in a computer. It confuses at the beginning so that a message that comes up in a scanner is 'FALLEN', and could not find any info in an internet. It results a message would have to be 'FULL'. Once some scanners are loaded, there is the button in a scanner to format a SD card, then can scan a next batch. 110/135/ And it can scan the film in 14M or 22M. Super8 Only scanners in 6M. 126/127 scanners in 16M. This Kodak the scanner is very easy to use. My Dad and the father in law was good photographers, and has had good cameras for a technology of his day. I dry each film with the microfiber lines before inserting them in a scanner. A film the negative scanners are clear, quite that would expect, but was pleasantly surprised in so vibrant and clears one 35mm the scanners of the slide are exited. I am having entertainment with easterly, and seeing pictures that does not take never seeing before.
4 / 5
A KODAK Mini Scanner of Slide and of enough of the Digital film has done exactly that has required he in. There is the enormous box of film and slide this has wanted to to see/save in shape digital.

- Easy to use
- Petit, compresses
- can save You photograph in a scanner, any SD the card by heart is required
- can use You your card of USB of the laptop to power a scanner and photograph of scrolling in your laptop very easily

- will be necessary clean You an interior frequently. It comes with the sense to brush to dry some strands of a clear/lentil. If no the dry was, some the resultant digital pictures fuzzies and hairs in the.
- A manual has not been useful. FYI--Through use, gives that when says 'FALL,' a memory is full and has to upload some photos have saved in a scanner in your computer and deletes the ones of a scanner. It does not take any a lot of pictures for the fill if you do not use the card. ( It excepts it IS well in it does not have to use a SD card--especially of my laptop does not have very void for unit)
- IS small (which are also he pro) but his marks of chairs of compact measure, look the small plastic--less durable
3 / 5
I have looked only fijamente swept 35mm slide. A scanner is easy to use and a quality is well.
I under grated the reason harvests an image. A spectator is quite WYSIWYG, as it can move a slide behind and advances in determent that is sides of court . Also it harvests an upper and fund, almost equally. Mina 2 slides is measured of regular image of 23mm x 34mm.
5 / 5
This conversor of Kodak of the slide is such the joy to use. Only I plugged he in my laptop and begun to use the. Taking a digital image is easy; editing some images are also easy and is by train to provide me with better quality digital images that an original 35mm slide! Has thousands of slide of my pre-the digital life concealed has not looked in in of the years, and now turn the digital images are amused and is going quite hurriedly. You can can a bit slide in a headline and cut the through a conversor with the minimum of endeavour. It have looked to have Walmart convert some slide for me the pair of years of marks, and go to cost the fortune, quotes a number of slide has. It opens it Finds that a resolution of some images is very well, and edit result in of the utmost pictures. This conversor will pay for him a lot of time on when is through with my project. Also I save me enough a-half of the cupboard in spatial that is taken at present up for stacks of carousels in his boxes. I am very, very happy with this Kodak Mini Scanner of Digital Film.
5 / 5
This scanner am adds for hobbyists. In 14mp, some scanners will not look the main sake that to 46 impression, but is all precise for the album of photo or publishing on-line.
5 / 5
It convert several slides of hundred in tiff a week is spent. Some of some slide were my grandparents and is glass, also fat for some titulars, as I slid the in in an inferior slide and and adjusted for location, has done well. So far it does not have any subject averts of any when being pas able to imagine was so to use a cord of USB to transmit some photos directly in my computer. Using it SD works of card, only more any one in a process. It does not have any problem with a device.
5 / 5
Fact very good and was able to do thru diverse plan of slide. Opened will accost It To it a negative old plus
4 / 5
VAL, folks, here is some roads. This scanner does very well for his purpose has feigned. It believes he of the archive that is adapted perfectly for on-line editor, sharing see email, and printing in relatively of small measures. 8 x 10 would be to press the. I see that the amazon is selling a lot of cheaper units those looks to have a same specs. I have paid extra for, frankly, a Kodak marks, has to sustain of need of client (any one so far).

Pluses: it IS hurriedly to use; you can digitise enough the little negative or slide the relatively low time. Some files are adapted by on-line publish and small impressions.

Minuses: Any soiled grandson envelope, streaky, or dusty material of source. Calm very require external to edit software to produce pertinent images. I use Lightroom, which are excellent to correct a colour launches these looks in of the a lot of scanners, takes something of powder and scratches, and dialing retreated one on-saturation in of the a lot of images. There is the plot to edit software there that it can it the to him a same. It does not expect of the impressions of quality of the exposure. Even so, it has attached which scanner is exited enough well, and shows a resolution and qualified by heart of a unit. It expects that it can do the decent 5' x 7' impression of this file.

Does not use a 22 file of MB has measured. Calm give you more details, and precise arrive-animal yours file to print, your software to edit will do the very better laws. If scanner something, and thinks, 'Wow, that is to say the slide adds /negative . Like the mark a 11' x 14 impression of him,' then around there and or issue a slide/neg in ScanCafe or the similar service, or purchases a Epson V600, which yields the very scanner of main quality. But it has routed the number of scanners of old negative in folks pictured in the, and has asked copy of measure of the main file of the this can do impressions, like the quality is still quite well.

Inferior line: if has the realistic expectations and he is had to to spend the small time in editing software (any troubling with a unit is editing controls), will be quite happy with some results.
4 / 5
Well, that is to say the little unit of sake for a prize. Has some subjects to imagine was so to centre some slide because of a measure of a window. Only it turns the side by side in a headline of slide to take more than a slide and seeds rotates the with a software after capture, like the problem has resolved. That is to say the add little bobo has the plot of old slide this has been that it wants to convert calm in digital. Limited correctability (RGB only) and rotation, but adapted for slide (also can adjust level of brilliance). For one the majority of part, better work that our old 'he' scanner that went also the personal scanner like this, only older. As it give it this the 4 stars so that an use of a unit is not so intuitive while it can be, but a fact that a company comprises the manual so that it does not have to go to line- to try to find one east the enormous plus . It recommends this for any one concealed wants the mere unit. Only it take to pose your slide through or after another in a void once has a headline of plastic slide in a unit. Apresamiento IS the small defiant so that it is due to to keep well you. Also, the time takes lost in a card and a unit close was and has to turn it on again. It IS something is doing even so. But once take used to to use it, apresamiento easy and breezy.

Top Customer Reviews: Wolverine Titan ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 23 ratings
5 / 5
Pros: Simple, quickly, easy controls, appropriate partorisca use of low end, seeing of television

Gilipollas: 35mm negative cropping, white-the diverse balance, grainy, highly compressed JPG, no for serious impressions or Photoshopping

Crappy Sensor: I have bought this reason a 20MP the sensor has not been interpolated like one 14/22MP scanner. But Wolverine negated any profit of this big sensor for (perhaps) using the sensor of low end that resulted in grainy scanner.

Powder of sensor: it can very easily clean a screen of face/of the sensor, powder like this random can plague your escáneres.

Machineries of sensor: the dark zones have 'halos' or 'will have' doing some useless photos. It sees has has attached photo.

35mm (135) Negatives Cropped: they Return so only well and it is fully viewable in a 2 negative carrier, then is cropped in a preview and when scanned.

Has to compress the death: A JPGs is to compress to 3-5files of MB. A JPG the machineries are horrible, especially in of the by heart continuous zones. Leave an option for Low-Med-Big quality JPGs with variable compression. Heck, Perhaps the RAW setting in the “Pro” model of a scanner :-)

White Balance: for a lot of negatives, of the balances of transport was quite near. Utilisation the simple controls can tweak the small of the take better.

The white balance WAS: Consider an option for “White Balance OF” those users of leaves to regulate in software later. Wolverine Knows a “temperature” of a light of source, like this easily can aforar a sensor to the “white “” would have to that look. This 'Pro' the characteristic would appeal to a lot of, a lot of people.
5 / 5
Has bought this based in the descriptions have found on Google. I have read some of some descriptions on Amazon and, although it was the little apprehensive, has decided to try the. I gave it 2 stars have based on facilitated of use. It has been dipped on well and, creates, was quite sincere when it is coming the instructions. That has not been happy roughly was a quality of an impression. It is very weighed in a green shadow - same after regulating some first levels to save. I have tried included save so it is and that tries to regulate afterwards in a computer but he have not helped. As I have done a decision for the turn. I roughly more investigation and has ordered a Kodak Scanza. While better regime with east a. It would not recommend this product is expecting for photo of good quality.
4 / 5
For a money & so that I am scanning them, this produced are adds. His really easy to use. Esees Has taken 20 years of negatives to spend for & like this far his summer quite quickly easy & . One 110 negs is the little harder that a 35mm but thats more the question with a measure of a half & any scanner he. It has not taken to mine 127 negs but would have to that go like this smoothly like embezzled.
My only complaint is that a do one in fact collects 35mm in some inferior & sides. Some sides are some easy fixed calm so much can slide a negative behind & advancing to take a better composition but a fund is stuck. Perhaps it could them try not using one drives. So only I am scanning pics of pupil of note by means of university like this the am not compromising a ansel adams photo but his still the small frustrating. Then again, it sweats $ 150. Already It Takes that it has paid it already for & the sound well with that.
UPDATE: I have taken around to transfer mine advantix (aps) negatives with one 110 slide inserts/inserts. Some drive are wildly was thus formed. It has Finalised to narrow a canal with some toothpicks. The better works that without but still has to that kinda wiggle a negative around to take he in a window of scrolling. pic Has attached.
4 / 5
My first impressions are that it is not like this easy to use like this announced and some the escáneres resultant are not like this as well as it had expected. Still I am valuing a product, but can finalise return the.

Has bought this mainly to digitize APS and 35mm negatives have travesías. One has attached the pictures aim some results of escáneres of mine of initial test. Using a incumplimiento settings, some escáneres were very dark with poor colour - mostly the blueish has maintained. With which fiddling with some settings, was able to take an acceptable scanner, but still any which considers the faithful colours. It would be likely to fix this with some colour correcting but was really while it averts scanner of estaca clean-up. The transmissions he far the plus to some settings can also helps. Calm can not change a incumplimiento settings, but at least maintains some settings was for escáneres subsequent.

So much a 35mm and APS the escáneres of harvests was quite the bit of some flanges of a negatives. One drives to film used for APS is the a lot, access very poor. There is significant game - perhaps until the ¼ thumb, which is in plot that considers a measure of a negative. A 35mm drives was better, but has had still some game. A picture in a screen and an image saved does not match . A scanner with a incumplimiento the values looked quite well in a screen, but to the equal that can see, one saves the scanner was much darker.

Some instructions say that it sustains it max of 32GB SD paper, but was able to use the 128GB paper without question. This in spite of, after seeing a measure of some files (5-6 MB each one which as), buying the 128GB the paper was overkill. Also the desire has had the scanner-the-option of computer in planting to scan to SD paper. A mini-the connection of USB is dated enough to arrive to this point, but does not treat it big of then comprise the boss. An interface of user could be bit it easier that comprise. I have annulled the number of scanner when have thinks that has begun one.
5 / 5
There is essentially two points for of prizes these conversores of photos: $ 400 or more and $ 150 or less. But a work (your time) to do a conversion is essentially one same in both points of prizes... It likes 1st calm question requires asks is:

'Quell'I be doing with some conversions'?

If a response is esaving memories for my girls or of the friends', then ossia a unit for you. Work well thus service; and it is very better that anything more there approaches this point of prize.

MAY... If a response is esaving mine artífice / commercial / professional work for posterity', this is not a unit for you. Here it is reason:

1) does not embroider to agree he-same flange for 35mm does.
2) does not have any correction for powder, specks, scratches, etc.; And it can be hard to see these until you see some photos in the format he big plus, like the monitor of computer. If calm his the, his too late; so much control for them frequently.
3) An interface is weighed a bit.
4) Has any way to clean powder of a internals of a unit. So that it calms to buy it, The MAINTAIN COVERED WHEN it Is not INTO USE!
5) The resolution is less than spectacular. The scrollings are so only roughly 3.3 megs each one that that.

Is REALLY WELL so that it is... But it is not the professional unit. Period.
4 / 5
Love this scanner! It is like this easy to use and also has an adapter for APS film. I have had originally it purchased it the different scanner to scan all mine negatives (on 5800 when I have finalised), but has finalised to return the reason has not had a APS adapter. Like this happy has done! Still for 35mm/110 negatives this one was much easier to use. One attaches that it comes with him for negatives the calm leaves feed to a car without that has to that dipped so only a nude the time to an adapter and then the scanner and the take was (likes some other options). To good sure it saver of time. There is included an option to relieve/darkens/to regulate an image in a screen to the equal that go, which is handy. It would recommend this product to any one. I have not had any one @subjects at all and was impressed really with like this easy and quickly was to use.
4 / 5
Has had this unit for the few weeks and finally dipped the up. A unit is quite easy to use, but would have been useful for some instructions to signal to a battery that opens, which I finally found. I have found that with a majority of some slides there is scanned the black line is by means of a fund. It is not in a slide likes seen in my light table. Has thinks that that I have had perhaps not dipping a slide in a headline quite well like this continued to do adjustments. Time and again a line has looked that has done the then necessary to go to soyy pictures' and collects a line out of the each one has shot. I go it to give a fine test and continuous , will return a unit.
4 / 5
Am converting slides to save for my family, and will not be photoshopping him. Some files are 72dpi and some files are 4-5mg each one that that. If I have required the main resolution would buy something more.
Are happy Titán @ is easy to use of then am copying 1000+ slides of @@@1950s - @@@1970s. Appearance some slides' colours to be the little out of @@@1950s and 60s like this some results are not me annoying. If a slide is vertical or a lot fully in place, could see black flanges in any side - but some premiers two slides here are of 1958 and looks adds.
A bridge has covered is of 1964 and unfortunately that the slide has something of age.
I also like a screen a big plus the one who the easy fact to ignore a blurry or boring slides.
5 / 5
Does not trust any of some good descriptions master escáneres pertinent. This device neither uses the a lot low quality sensor, or a software is terrible but some escáneres are grainy pixelated and horrible. Besides, it collects an image of all the sides. So has the photo to group that closely access to a frame, will have to choose a person to cut was.
Has had the $ 20 scanner of ebay do the better work that this, has had them big hopes been due to a 20mp sensor and the big indication but any look of photos have been taken of the mine old cellphone.
4 / 5
A prime minister two times have used this scanner, has done as it has announced. It was easy to use and has done the quite good work to scan 35 mm slides and negatives. A quality of some escáneres was quite good -- better that has expected. This in spite of, some third time used it, there is prendido to do. I have called service of client. A man has spoken to useful era. It has said that that has touched like the free boss. It has recommended that return an element to Amazon for substitution. A substitution has arrived two days later. It has been this in spite of rid to a wrong house. Have has had to that stroll it up and down a neighbourhood until I have found a container in the porch of the neighbour.
Liked a way a scanner done --- until him the no. felt that Wolverine the service of client was useful. An element has shipped promptly, but has been fallen is gone in a wrong allocution. If this hard substitution more than three days, will write another description.

Top Customer Reviews: KODAK 35mm Slide ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
1 / 5
The product has not done so promised, a lot, a lot the slide would not expel has had tombs the variety of tools to oblige them to expel. I do not create it it was a condition of some slide but a squad. He two any efficiently expels the for unfamiliar reasons. It returns this product and has purchased the dress of casserole and laws very better.
3 / 5
It have estimated a spectator with 5 stars if it was not for a fact that some slide takes bonded in him while it likes him expel him. As I have to turn a spectator the other way around in dislodge the. Otherwise, IS a awesome spectator. It provides the angle adds that to see each slide and a magnification is exactly cual necessity to take the good look in the each slide.
3 / 5
Fulfilling that when presses a button for a clear, sometimes the rests ignited (this would be my preference ) and sometimes he no. Also sometimes a clave of slide and does not fall was when powder and lines a button of the emission and I have to choose a unit up and jiggle he (or the turn on). These things are troubling, but is still able to see slide very enough to learn what a subject is and as it have to when being oriented so he which need.
1 / 5
Quan Took had something of water in a lentil of interior, the slide would not go to the unit of failure, and covers to be able in loose era and not doing contact. Use 'Kodak' pending products of the decades, and this no a quality expected of the Kodak of marked product!
5 / 5
It IS the useful and fun device . Still I take my film of the trace of slide and like control of my slide without posing in my projector. It was the experience adds to be able still to buy the Kodak marked spectator. Work well, but conscious when being that it is not diagrams he highly precise. It is adapted the plastic but a window in sight looks for to be glass.
1 / 5
These products is not to estimate a money. Some slide takes bonded in a reader, then have it the fish was manually. An extension is not very enough to say a lot in a picture is trying to see.
4 / 5
My Dad was an active photographer the majority of his life and has had 100 is of 35mm slide. To cross them was easy with this tool. Although some have taken bonded in an expel, was so that they were slightly warped of age. I have been done the day.
5 / 5
Coverage my familiar slide of one 40s thru an early 60s. It wants that it was before deciding that to do with them the laws of product add. Highly recommend it his
5 / 5
The light is brilliant. The magnification IS well. So much better that a type an old plus of the spectator of the slide has used to has.
4 / 5
I took this to go thru old familiar slide. He the good work although sometimes a clave of slide. Also it ignites flickers frequently. But no the bad spectator for a prize.

Top Customer Reviews: Wolverine 8mm & ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
5 / 5
I am the hobbyist 8mm and sper 8 collector of film, and what a lot, has more film in my studio that is well for me (that is to say that says, in all the case).

After reading all some discussions in a Wolverine first generation MovieMaker, has taken one submerges and has bought this when a Pro resulted available in Amazon.

In recap, a consensus of internet was that a version 1 (a) was VAL in of the conversions, any utmost, (b) could only cape 5' reel, (c) any one also well with old together, (d) the earliest versions were prone in overheating, (and) has not been recommended by rewinding, because of the small engine, (and) has taken video in only 720p, (f) converted everything in 30fps.

After quite a lot of 5 days to evaluate a Moviemaker Pro, here is my thoughts
(a) Resolution- Better: Yes, it takes 1080p video. That is to say probably to spare for the majority of some images has. There is some charm to have the no perfect video.

(b) Exposure And acuteness- has Adapted: has an option of compensation of the exposure. Even so, in the each parameter there is still a car-the exposure concealed can see you 'adjust' some frames some dark plus up, or some bass of the clearest frames. Like this, a result of final is the plot of utensils of compression in of the dark frames, and sometimes behind-and-hunt advances of exposure in of the scenes with a level of intermediary of brilliance. But in general, it likes him. The majority of a video has does not justify 1080p, and is quite easy in crunch some utensils have entered dark scenes (that it will leave it the quite dark, but then, that is to say a character of an object of source).
An additional element is balance of automatic aim , which looked to change a tone to paint if some images zoomed in in an object. There is the 'golden hour' scene of evening, where the edifice was orange of a sun to pose while a heaven coated the averages a frame, but like scene zoomed in, result less orangy. This is not that door of film .

(c) Measure of file- Well: My calculations have aimed the compatible 9.47-9.48 Mbits/dry, which come besides or 71.00 less MBytes/min. This does quite well a very clear day external scenes.

(D) Road of film- Well: A side of source has a knob for a film to go down, and then has a clear bed with the slide-was spent (which are where the together thickness to take bonded), after has the mechanism of claw of the solo to advance a film. After it conceal there it is four knob for a film in zigzag around. A two subordinated ones have the different texture. That is to say where my old together broken (sometimes). Even so, that is to say to require to do sure that one apresamiento-arrives to reel the tension is murdered in of the minimum levels to ensure that the frames are planted consistently. I have tried different combinations of any knob, and they all one shudders of video in of the different titles.

(F) Imposed of frame (acceptable): A tax of frame of 20fps is clearly better that 30 fps, and can see a logic to choose the value among 18 and 24, more afterwards in 18. Quite a lot of 10% fast changes an action, but moderately, and yes is accusing of clave , that is to say easy in sleeve. It has been marginally better was gone with 18, but while I have mentioned, 20 is acceptable, particularly if you are not too enthusiastic to learn that to use the video that edits application.

At the end, the dotted pair
1. It outrage an unavoidable to joint-bonded and together-broken, had the pair of case where a processor has frozen, but a film advancer has maintained to do until a machine has been changed has been. My supposition is that an electronic is sensitive in small arises, possibly caused for a bomb to heat this ignites (winter). I have moved a MovieMaker in a Seamless Supply to Be able to have, and so far have it very happenned.

2. It likes him to him another has said, maintain an acuteness down- this help prevents unnatural verges, and that is to say something concealed can be it done accuses of clave if the precise.

3. It has had the little more subject with 8mm film that sper 8, which attribute mostly in an age more orders of 8mm. In fact, some of a Sper 8 images have to one mid-80s is quite gorgeous, probably because of technician and better cameras.

4. I prefer zooming has been to take one sprocket holes, as well as has adjoining frames in some upper and melts of a picture. These taken a rest of an image out of one estandard' zone, particularly for 8mm. This also helps in case that a gesture of some drifts of frames to reel to reel in the long session. I maintain one 'W' parameter in 1 (0 east one the majority of zoomed was). Again, mine workflow comprises to accuse of the clave for some images is interested in, and in the casual view is to add it aesthetic to adapt of a real character of a material of source.

Acclaims, and enjoys your images. That is to say some things that any one sometime has thought was that it imports for them to take, and place in the plot of time, endeavour, learning and money to create. Anniversary, Pairs, Holidays, Natal, Thanksgiving, familiar visits, trips of road, deployments of service, races of tug, cruises, picnics of backyard-- is everything there. I want the, and thank you Wolverine to create this machine.
3 / 5
A device is ready and innovator and provides the surprisingly acute image and image by heart well; very I which to be able to touch by behind a right of film in a scanner.

My subject my big plus is with a film bogging down in a door. There be enormous to tug of a film in a door because of a dish of pressure around a film-advance pawl. This dish of pressure is done to armour plate but would have to be done of drop-friction delrin or nylon, or included the spatial door with the light tug applied in the cape of a door by a part of supply. A pawl is not always quite strong to pull a film, leaving images that is jerky or has displaced vertically. This problem can arrive well in a half of the scene, any necessarily in the joint.

One $ 185 more expensive Wolverine Pro the model is aimed in a place of Amazon, and in the manual of user of a product, with 400' reels. Why it is a device shipped with only the 200' take-arrive to reel? That has been supposition to do , left a rest 200' of spill of film in a fund?

Some rollers that defines a road of film, is in fact clave of rigid plastic that some tugs of film through, alternatively in a base and an EMULSION!. Like minimum, this clave would have to be grooved so that only some verges of a tug of film in some clave. Better still, could do some clave of the low friction delrin or nylon, and included better would be grooved coverages that rotates in of the rays of shoulder. Wolverine The rollers have used to feign this looked well in a photo of advertising but is guaranteed to line a film. That is to say engineering of deceptive advertising and very poor!

Under your Specificatins, shows a be of tax of the frame 20 frames. This gives a impresion that the film is scanned film in 20 frames for second, when in fact is 2-3 fps. It IS a speed of playback that is to say 20 fps. Please clear that in your advertising and manual of user.

Why choose the no-regulate 20 fps speed of playback? Any one 8mm the the camera has used the tax of frame of 20 fps. It regulates 8 cameras have shot in 16 fps. Sper 8 cameras have shot in 18 or 24 fps. Can mark it he no a game to film back speed in a the majority of tax of common frame of one the majority of prevelant has formed, Sper 8, which are 18 fps?

A Manual of User, p. 10, it Declares some dimensions 10X main that a real measure (ej.: 120 In. Long (10 ft. Largo). Only the typo, but please correct the.

A digitizer would not have to remain unattended when scanning film. Sometimes some marshes of low film in a half of the scene, because of one that the film of advances pawl any one when being pas able to win a friction of a dish of pressure of the metal in a door of film;

would be It useful to have a film-reels the roots extend in a back side of an arm and containing he so that has something to line to prevents rotation of a root while attaching a reel and the test varies a cover in a root in the groove in a reel.

A light of the scanner a bit is blinding. It was useful to have the light these resplandores down in a door to film us so many could see that a film is inserted properly down some two white tabs;

some reels of the film would have to be spaced further out of a face of a device, to prevent warped reels to tug in a device. It conceal also it helps to him it prevents a film these tugs in a frame of a LCD when rewinding.

An engine in a taking-above the reels would have to be stronger. Sometimes some reels will not pull a slack film out of a door, especially apropa an end of the 400' reel. Wolverine Uploads $ 185 more for a Pro version that capes 400' reel so many can provide to do a apresamiento-arrives engine quite strong to handle one 400' reel. These necessities of same engine to be stronger to handle a rewind, which at present are s l-or-w!

This can not be of entity but a procedure of rewind poses a film behind in some original reels with the reverse embroil.

Be useful if some reels of the supply there has been some light back tug so that a film would not open up and develop out of a reel. This would be of particular use scanning for a second time so that this film has the reverse to embroil and wants to open up. My crude solutioin was to plant the clear booklet in a device and left rest slightly on, and tug on, a cup of some reels of supply.

Sometimes an image is jumpy and quite blue. With all some elections for DIRECTED is, Wolverine could have chosen a FOCUSED with the natural plus, the warmest colour. For comparison, has had the reel of Sper 8 scanned by the commercial service, not doing frame-for-swept of frame, but conventional projection in 18 fps where a colour is exited much more of course, and without vertical jitter.

Another that concealed, like me.
4 / 5
Opened has converted it quite a lot of 10 hours of 8mm and sper 8mm film. Quan Has begun, has taken some problems with a road to film concealed apresamiento blockaded. But a solution is in simply bypass a road and has a film goes directly saw one 3 (of four) spindles in a taking-arrive to reel (sees semi-detached image). I have done of this change can scan 7 reels of inch without any problem. It Likes him that a pot on-scan to adjust a scanner and of him then edits in 16x9 version. Importantly, does not edit to seat around looking a reel (since 7 inches will take several hours). Work quite well
2 / 5
Usually do the plot to research before buying something concealed is so expensive, but so that anteriorly had purchased the Wolverine scanner of slide with big satisfaction, supposed this 8mm the conversor of the film has been to be also. Alas, conceal it has not been to be. This unit was bad and flimsily has done without quite a lot of torsion to pull the reels of big film through a mechanism of scrolling. It maintains to hang mid-scrolling, which has meant has had to on, and every time I that, a counter ticks until a magic number of 200, in that point a warrantee expra. So that he the scrolling hangs, can any one has prendido only he and fixed a problem; you have to begin on.

Other subjects were a lack to tune adjustments while a scrolling was in progress. If a frame results problematic, can not fix (or anything more) in a fly. So much compensation of the only exposure can be done in a principle of the scrolling and directing while it is spending. That is to say thwarting.

This unit takes the long time to transfer films; quite a lot of 20 minutes for the 50-the reel of feet. You will have to babysit scrollings, especially reels main, which can take three or four hours or more.

IS returned this product so that to arrive to this point of prize, would have to have more control in a quality of some scrollings while they have crossed. These suggestions would do east the sper produced for the the one who has load of 8mm or Sper 8mm the film that hangs around. Of your films are perfect, this probably will do well since you. But the mine reels was big with the multiple circles jointed together this has been shot under variable conditions, and some results were has adapted only. No very enough for the $ 449 compraventa.
5 / 5
A unit those transfers 8mm and sper 8 film in digital format? One can provide to buy alone name? An idea adds. Careers of scrolling of the film anywhere of $ 5 in $ 40 for the 50 reel of feet, some measures that catered /come from the camera of film of the house. If has the bouquet of films, concealed attaches in fast to the point where leaves your lovely memories that chair in the drawer. Odds IS does not have the projector or a burned light bulb was or only does not have a patience to try for the pose up.

VERY $ 500 is at all. That is to say a same cost while the road was 15-25 films. But control of offer in your eventual costs. Perhaps it can offer to do a bit for other familiar members or of the friends, also.

A Wolverine Pro Offers of unit some real profits in a regular model, as I am revising a Pro model after extensive use.

CHARACTERISTIC - the animals of big scanners 1080 frame for scanners of frame. Pro The model accepts until 400 reels of feet. Pro Lima of records of the version in 20 frames the second (compared in a speed of original film of 15-16 frames for second and the 30 frames of one another unit for second). The machine believes MP4 file in SD card until 32 gb (the has not comprised card) can see which in any computer. The diagram also offers cape of USB and powers to transfer the video and the films have finished out of minijack in 480 dpi for entrance in other devices. There are adjustments for contrast, acuteness, and period of capture of the frame and situate of width, and a capacity in zoom in or out of the bit. Some last helps in cases where a register of film can have strayed of a level or yes has the reason to record a periphery or aiming roughly of a movement of void. Easy in navigate the cards and the exposure of the colour aim you some frames to film while they are being read.

The TIME REQUIRED - to scan each frame, he 50 reels of feet that takes quite 30 minutes. One measures of the resultant file is quite 200K.

QUALITY - A MP4 the quality is not a More i adds, for earnest be. Very the looks of grain in some videos but that it is partly so that it is by train to scan you the tiny piece of film in relatively of big resolution. But a MP4 the compression has used is visually noisy and visually distract with still modest blowups of a video. It has been well to comprise diverse user-options of selectable compression A road to fix that is to say to import one MP4 file in a program to edit with capacities to clean in a video (any comprised and in an additional cost any one already possesses such software) or debit he in Youtube (Free). Pose of load he through the different compression that in fact clean on some utensils and grain. Still it can you download behind in your computer after to of the archive a file. So while it was well for the have everything in or no, is turned easily in the film of better quality. I can;t estada with certainty that a main resolution is in fact to better plot that a very-pro resolution of machine because of some limitations of an original film. But a speed of the slowest file (20 frames for second for a pro against 30 frames for second for one very-pro) done the enormous difference sees pleasure.

DEFIES Film of Poor quality sprockets will pose a machine in the standstill. A lot owe the when being babysat in a fund during a process of register. My original unit has prendido to plot for apparently of fine film. I am returned he for work of guarantee. It sees low support.

LEAN - Five stars. Has problem with a diet of films. A llama in some very good people in a manufacturer and they emitted one RMA, fixed and is returned a machine. They have paid so many roads of surpassed. A machine is returned had the fewer problems of plot of diet. Any one flawless but honestly, few things are. Work well.

Gives it FIVE STARS in spite of any feeble zones. That is to say so that calm give you the alternative capacity in the little prize other things never . Used with some right expectations, recommends this wholehearted.

UPDATE of UPDATE of the UPDATE: after it runs over 400 films through a unit, has think that an update could helps another.

QUALITY to start with: Justo in sake. This will not substitute having the the yours films done by the professional system, but present;t failure in that. A diagram of compression has used to to compress some films in the relatively small measure present to plot of utensils. There is any road to adjust it. Can be it it minimise it the bit to blur an original image through a parameter of Mays of house... It conceals very it is trading a weakness for another. Uploading a file in Youtube obliges the second compression in him which, miraculously, softens out of the reat roads of one artifacting. There is also third solutions of party for filters that records with the popular video that edits continuations. A challenge is that applying them takes time, as it does to upload in Youtube. But fixed some of one the majority of subjects of serious quality.

RELIABILITY: it depends a bit in a quality of a film. It break sprockets Through can he of curve;t treats well. Misaligned sprockets Can arrive when the different films are jointed joints in reeling main (that in a lot of case was common). It means that really need to look a machine while short or the different portions of your film have misaligned film (the upper show in a fund of a frame etc). Or can see it after and then rescan parts of a film. Any one entertainment of the point of view of time, but there is not any road around the.

Has had all the problems to order that clue properly and has thinks that was in an end of is life . I have posed then the new circle of film in month later and...Suddenly the work again. Any one that would be necessary there is it queixat after running 400 circles of several films of measure through him. Cela Would have cost me several dollars of thousand to digitise professionally.

RESOLUTION: Donat a big quantity of artifacting, is not sure would buy a pro version for a main resolution. Absolutely buy it his so that a speed of the game of resultant film is more afterwards in an original without editing and for a capacity to reel main.

SCANNERS of SAMPLE: if it visits a canal the families other People in Youtube can see you some films run with different parameters and some results.

Still offer these five stars.
1 / 5
These products does not do so announced out of a box. Some powers-side tensioning is unsuitable, so--so reel unwinds-- presses a film in a mechanism of claw inconsistently, which results in video that is so jittery, is unwatchable. To take reasonable results, goes to have that attaches your own tensioner, which are not acceptable for the product this coast almost $ 400. In of the this, a uptake side tensioning is overkill. If you use each what four spindles, goes to see more the jams and the calm will break joint. One issues of the whole film is only really, he very bad has designed. In of the this, a Wolverine very automatically detects an end of a film and register of decree. It looks to detect some jams and pause, but no a normal end of a film. Quan Some favours out of swipes a mechanism of claw, often takes bonded and a Wolverine will tug/to press in him indefinitely until manually prender a capture. If you very babysit each capture, is going in wind up with longitude fatality in an end of your videos or same mangled film.

IS had to invert the plot of time tinkering with a Wolverine, can take it to do and produce reasonable captures. But, for a prize, these products does not rid the value adapted because of the inversion of the time massively has required for the take to do. At the end, only it accepts until the 32GB SD card. While this limitation is declared clearly in a page of product, is ridiculous and further reinforces a bad mechanic, electrical, and build of software that is gone in this product.
4 / 5
Some observations after two months to use my Wolverine Pro.

He the quite decent work with filming that it is in good condition. If there is bad sprocket holes, the joint of thicknesses, film warping because of age, etc, then pode problems of experience.

Although it can accommodate reel main that his predecessor, does not recommend using big reels. One 50ft the reel this takes quite 30min. A 400ft the reel this takes 2hores. Some the big plus reels this takes the longest plot. The problems are more probably to arise with reeling longer. Sometimes the big reels can untangle during scanning so that there have it hardly any friction in a source reels the side and he turn quite freely.

Can, inspects the yours the premier reels in front of scanning. Clean and repair the with new together so it required. It asks it the tape can help with zones of fractions sprocket holes.

Remarks that your guarantee will expire after a 200 account is achieved. It conceals it it can be very yes it has the small collection. But you will run in a counter to experience with parameters for each reel, or rerecording the reel something was bad, like the pause. Some of mine reel, I zoom to fill one 4:3 screen And the time 2 to take more than a film (with sprocket holes and each what) to do the 16:9 version, this eats 2 accounts in your 200 limit. The All the advertisings in fast.

Use he for the professional work or that modifies a unit in any also null issues your guarantee.

HAS the main resolution that his predecessor. 1440x1080p More concealed 720p. One MP4s is recorded now in 20fps more concealed 30fps. That is to say more afterwards in 8mm (16fps) and Super8 (18fps) imposed of playback but still fast and can wants to adjust in yours edits the software those uses an interpret-playback-imposed-so much option when imports some videos. An option to pose an immersion-date in a MP4 for 16fps or 18fps would be well, although a capture of hardware is done in fact in 20fps.

Uses the monitor (with overscan is possible, or LCD of full screen) to take accurate to frame, anybody tiny Wolverine screen of LCD. It tries the few different sections of your film. Well Framing punctual in a reel, could be besides late. Perhaps zoom in another step or two.

The exposure and To the acuteness is usually more in a default parameters.

Clean with the air compressed after each reel accused, a bit of the paintbrush included very a lot. I dry some from time to time too many spindles.

There has always soiled for the improvement and the calm can see that they that among a premier Wolverine and some new Wolverine Pro. Like the view the cape he small robust plus of finicky reels he of film (has improved mechanism/of powers of attraction). Parameters of compression of frame and adjustable video-the taxes would be well. For a prize, one Wolverine Pro is quite sake.
4 / 5
The machine adds to copy old 8mm and Sper 8 films. He very better that any one another method has used (comprising film of a door). Only I have two complaints:

In the first place, a scanner needs the pause! Quan powering Jointed And or broke films, some decrees to scan frequently. That is to say to be expected, even so, every time restarts after the bad together, etc. Some advances of account of the film. A problem is, a counter of film has the habit of measured that the guaranteeed has left. A guarantee is during a year Or 200 reels of film. I have finished only to do quite 15 circles to film very old - but a counter is already in a 60 east because of frequent decrees. As my guarantee is already a third has used up after 15 reels!

A second complaint is - a beat to guarantee that is vastly different for different users. A person could run 200 7' reel (providing any one of them unemployed while recording, advancing an account prematurely) while another person could run 200 3' reel (again providing any one of them unemployed). A first person with one 7' the reels has run 80,000 feet of film through a machine, while a person with 3' the reels has run only 10,000 feet. Even so both have used in his guarantee.

A counter that composed the feet would be the a lot of issues it the justest of gauging how many rests of guarantee. This road does not import that time has to induct and pause he in the reel only of film - does not affect a guarantee. Also - all the world takes a same quantity to guarantee any subject that measured the reels is running. Another that the counter those advances every time prender a machine, that is to say the device adds !
1 / 5
Spent a whole morning that come from the digitise two 3' circles to film that it is in the condition adds (very sprockets, any joint, etc). The problems experimented was to annoy taking a film to move advance, recording during the minute or so then prendido, boot among a same frame, any one when being pas able very time in included take a to start with moving film, included with a lot of sprockets.
Has expected that this would exit since has a lot of tapes the digitise, but a factor of frustration with some beginning and decrees, and it taking to move the before again was also. Tried a trick in a web of place has suggested quite posing the small paper wedge in a feeder for 8mm film that was perhaps the small width. It conceal he no for me. That little of the segments have directed to take equally, a quality looked quite well, even so has some soft jitteriness has remarked. A film has been planted down some 3 tabs while they have suggested to prevent this.
5 / 5
Clean was the coverage and the family have found 8mm films for 3 generations. The road them in of the pauses to be turn the video would have cost very time what a Wolverine MovieMaker Pro has cost.

Is not swift, but does not have to when being. (And in fact, the calm left you to do other things while he ) accuses 8mm or Sper 8 in 2 frames for second. It accuses in 200 it reels he without included the hick-up. He only the annex the pair of things in his manual. 1- you go to do a lot the clave those accuses to adjust a speed or stabilise very flutter, will want to 'the zoom was' and record whole apple and included some hole of powers of the pin. This will give you 'wiggle room' when it accuses of clave. A stabilisation to take and jitters and the flutter usually will finish 'that short' roughly of of the this has been. Besides the cases have not required to do very additional to cut.

Sper 8 taking bit it more in juggle likes distributed takeup the reels is 8mm centrical hub so much has to move reel adapters with a Sper 8 reels.
Has so much a MovieMaker and a MovieMaker Pro and can say that they both do the splendid work with 50 reels of feet (3') but yes has any one 5' or 7' reel you will want a pro model. A model regulates has the time takes with some big plus reels. Also, only he 5' take-arrive to reel comes with. If has 7' reel you will require to take the 7' take-up.

Top Customer Reviews: DIGITNOW 22MP ...

Rating: 4 out of 5 with 60 ratings
5 / 5
Desprs Read through soycualquiera' the descriptions have ordered this model because of a fact has had neagtives and slide of different formats. An arrival of small box prompty and was very surprised in a weight, measure and fragitlity of some annexes. After an hour to try to read and comprehend a intructions left for a night, has had the glass of wine and slept in the. It arouses a next morning with my challenge to take mine to the hovering of this small box. After several cups of tea and the plot of patience and test for mostly the error scanned in 300 refusals.
Basically takes what apresamiento! It does not expect 40 negative year to exit like your modern digital. In a 1970s there was the field of the informative postal companies like Trifca and Trippleprint start with the field of films of quality and devlopment. Some of my old photos are very clear and some owe orange of tower and shadow of terrible green. Also it take that with one 126 there has been this terrible few cubes to flash to take inner photos. My inner photos are not well. ( Return of the van of some developers likes him those that) In the first place an annex of slide is an easy plus to use while it maintains to power in new slide. It take that although has the slide has been there formed of to different film likes him the mark sure press this button. The slides are well. After coming a 35m negative. These are quite easy to power through an annex but this involve to touch some refusals the plot. Quality to scan only depends. Pose my modern plus ones through (only 10 years) old and a quality is VAL. Better for external photos even so. If some refusals is lined then uses Picasa in your laptop. A cart adjusts or ' is listening lucky' the buttons are usually enough to enhance a photo. If some looks of a lot of photo the scratch done the decision is value he or no? A retouches the laws of button but takes time. If has any photos and some refusals is lined then only flatbed his scanner. You will take the most natural colour. One 110 negative annex the headline is very small and still is doing in the. If you want to see the scanner then Maplins has some. Then it can you decide yes to order or. If only have 35m negative then perhaps go for a model a cheap plus.
Step only some time when has time to use this machine. Yes it is pricy in some ways but has the not founding anything more there those covers all these formats. It is not postponed immediately. It takes time and has patience. You will be surprised that comes up with the memory spent did not fulfil has had to way that has to be worth it it. As I Have said only save in a SD the card has bought and after he you the number then scrollings in laptop and photoshop.
Has attached some photos 'genuine' of a past. A sandsculpture is 35m and besides or he less done 15 years. A photo of old mill and a shark of the earth of the jaws and Disney is of 1970s. A small daughter is of 1970s and shows what orange and green looks. There is or vacacional of Tunisia besides or he less done 10 years.
IS happy to answer questions.
Two tips: If has some photos that can you very photoshop these see old and the oranges then only turn a photo in black and aim in Picasa and the stress. Some results are so better and pint very always dread it.These be 1970s again. Voice the photos Also check a screen before you begin to scan. Like a critic mentions powders etc inner in time. It takes an adapter was and blow clear or use the hairdryer in dulcemente and fresco. Help. It has scanned the whole plot and could not exit why marks had everything in some same places. Easy to resolve. I am now rescanning some photos have taken earlier and is so clearer.
5 / 5
It IS exactly while it describe. Light and small weight. Access neatly in a delivery. The works add while I have seated to look television while scanning 35mm negative. One has limited the instructions are the small confusing at the beginning. With only 5 buttons do not take very time to imagine the things was. Beginning with a power. Desprs Turning it on, can change a scanner of 14mp in 22 mp. Has options to look game behind. It selects Cambra is an icon to press a 'COST' button. This enters a road of Capture. Once there it uploads a film in a pertinent protective plastic. Desprs Very try battle with a door of coverage in a negative adapter, decided in forgo take he in and out of a scanner. I have pressed instead each which touches of film in a left wing and moved through some refusals with ease. Of one 32 GB card by heart, a poster of view of the shows to paint this has room for 10,000 beaks. A negative was main that a view to scan but no for a lot of. If the impression was 4 x 6 in of the photos, can lose 1/4 in in a left side or right depends that you slide a negative to scan. Once have row, presses a button to SCAN. Of him there you can I enter one edits road to fix pint or contrast. I have chosen to leave this in the photo that edits software instead. If you are happy with a scanner, COSTS of press, like the icon excelled in a screen is asking to SAVE an image. The saving takes quite 4 seconds while the hour of small yellow the looks of glass in an image. A counter of corner by right upper mark a number of the scanners saved and one in that quantity of rests. Everything is in a SD the card and the calm can leave it there or movement he in the computer. Mere. Has intentions to scan hundreds of thousands of refusals. It does not have any idea that time this plastic of light will line era. Also I plan to give a small light the pause to cool down also.
1 / 5
I have run two sets of four refusals through and has taken a message of the error and he have prisoner to do verified the place of web of a manufacturer that was to take to use and any help I then emailed a manufacturer has said the plus or less a problem and has asked the like reset a device. They said it the has not comprised and has wanted photos. I routed some photos and the furthest explanation and never listened of them again A later nicknamed week the amazon and was any problem had me return he for the repayment Later that the week has bought another negative scanner and I are happy Thank you Amazon
5 / 5
I have bought some marks of device some time to digitise mine in of the films of 20 years. Also I have to it advance it you of road, is a photographer to give absolute support and 'casual', so yes is looking for the highly technical description, is bad here. I try to describe a practicability of a point of view of the user that has used a scanner to of the archive an old negative once ....
A (adjustable) the quality the scanner is sufficient in my opinion for a 'normal user'. Especially you want to file some old photos essentially digitally. If you are looking for resolutions and maximum quality very big, then, of course, with 1,800 dpi, will not find the device that conforms these requisites. The powder of course would have to when being taken of some refusals with a paintbrush have distributed before, can reduce the scratches retrospectively only software very limited - has tried this once, but has not been satisfied with a result and then the the wing left only he. Has then somehow a same charm like scratches in a elep old .... Nevertheless, I have found a correction of automatic image, some results found the total of enough of appeal in me.
Some results in general, thinks is likely to see. One has scanned the refusals has resulted essentially in of the photos that would have expected also and this reflects so much some possibilities have limited of my photographic squad then mere technician, in or another hand, but also something nostalgic. I am satisfied and has something 'ticked was' again.
5 / 5
The element is the small smaller this has expected. Even so, it is easy to use and the laws add. For a money, was the good purchase and the nave was very fast.
5 / 5
Easy to use and hurriedly has posed up.

I amour this thing. It IS so magic.
5 / 5
Only cual required to take old familiar slide and has digital photos. Easy to use even so it can use it more instructions of use. Even so, it was able in easily begin
5 / 5
I have purchased this and the present navideo and my brother was ecstatic! It surprises to see what clear and concise some photos looked although they have been taken he almost done 10 years when the technology has not been anywhere near while advance. To well sure it recommends that it purchase east!
4 / 5
State postponing this project for so long now mostly because of some coast associated with him, thought that it would have to take my refusals in the some place that has converts them, so happy has found this in the amazon and I can only he I and has each digital, attaches little artilugio to have.
5 / 5
I produce it adds. Fast quality , good scanners directly of refusals. The feeder is the clumsy but feasible bit. To good sure recommended.

Related YouTube Video: